Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Lunawood Rough Thermo Timber D (en) en

A more recent version of this data set exists in the database.

Most recent version of this data set:00.05.001

Key Data Set Information
Reference year 2022
Name
Lunawood Rough Thermo Timber D
Use advice for data set This EPD covers the following modules: A1 (raw material supply), A2 (transport) and A3 (manufacture), transportation to client (A4), End-of-Life (C) and supplementary information beyond the life cycle (D).
Technical purpose of product or process Lunawood is a sustainable, durable and dimensionally stable wood material for facades, landscaping and interiors and saunas, all properties achieved without chemicals naturally through Thermal Modification. Lunawood Thermowood does not require surface coatings even in the most challenging climate conditions which makes it a truly sustainable choice throughout its life cycle. This allows the project to have that naturally weathered color, if desired. The letter ‘S’ in ‘Thermo-S’ stands for ‘stability’. Along with appearance, stability is a key property in the end use applications of the products in this treatment class. The letter ‘D’ in ‘Thermo-D’ stands for ‘durability’. Along with appearance, biological durability is a key property in the end use applications of products in this treatment class. Products from the two mills are technically identical and this EPD presents average product on the market. The average EPD data for GWP total – indicator in this EPD differs more than 10 % between the two mills.
General comment on data set Modules A1 is based on inventory of RTS EPD 124_21 over its modules A1 to A3. All the raw material transportation in A2 is inventoried. In module A3 all energy use, including mills’ own heat plants, other material usage, use of machinery in the mills, packing materials, production waste treatment and necessary transportation of goods have been included. Module A4 is inventoried as a weighted average of loads and distances to the Lunawood Ltd. clients. In module C scenario covers machine used for demolition (C1), transportation to the waste treatment (C2), chipping of deconstruction wood for energy wood (97 %) and waste wood (C3) and treatment of waste wood (C4). Module D presents net gains of using deconstruction wood instead of regular woody materials in a CHP plant in Finland.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 210.0 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 3.13 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2027
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system ThermoWood® Handbook, International ThermoWood Association. https://www.thermowood.fi.

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
 Transport
A4
 De-construction
C1
 Transport
C2
 Waste processing
C3
 Disposal
C4
 Recycling Potential
D
Use of renewable primary energy (PERE)
Input
  • 1.44E+3
  • 0.00163
  • 0.0216
  • 0.0146
  • 10.5
  • 0.117
  • -2.54
Use of renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials (PERM)
Input
  • 8.05E+3
  • 0.000509
  • 0.00639
  • 0
  • 7.82E+3
  • 242
  • -4.31E+3
Total use of renewable primary energy resource (PERT)
Input
  • 9.49E+3
  • 0.00214
  • 0.028
  • 0.0146
  • 7.83E+3
  • 242
  • -4.31E+3
Use of non renewable primary energy (PENRE)
Input
  • 1.93E+3
  • 0.187
  • 4.98
  • 1.04
  • 50.4
  • 8.93
  • -82.8
Use of non renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials (PENRM)
Input
  • 32.5
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Total use of non renewable primary energy resource (PENRT)
Input
  • 1.97E+3
  • 0.187
  • 4.98
  • 1.04
  • 50.4
  • 8.93
  • -82.8
Use of secondary material (SM)
Input
  • 0.141
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -0.00931
Use of renewable secondary fuels (RSF)
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Use of non renewable secondary fuels (NRSF)
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Use of net fresh water (FW)
Input
  • 1.69
  • 0.0000207
  • 0.000295
  • 0.000123
  • 0.162
  • -0.00417
  • 0.0958
Hazardous waste disposed (HWD)
Output
  • 0.0274
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Non hazardous waste dispose (NHWD)
Output
  • 2.65
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Radioactive waste disposed (RWD)
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Components for re-use (CRU)
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Materials for recycling (MFR)
Output
  • 0.847
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Materials for energy recovery (MER)
Output
  • 0.195
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 417
  • 0
  • 0
Exported electrical energy (EEE)
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Exported thermal energy (EET)
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
 Transport
A4
 De-construction
C1
 Transport
C2
 Waste processing
C3
 Disposal
C4
 Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 1.93E+3
  • 0.187
  • 4.98
  • 1.04
  • 50.8
  • 8.93
  • -82.1
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.000295
  • 2.58E-8
  • 1.87E-7
  • 2.39E-7
  • 3.5E-7
  • 0.00000214
  • -0.0000266
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0.695
  • 0.000144
  • 0.00204
  • 0.000345
  • 0.00457
  • 0.00612
  • -0.0375
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.0000147
  • 2.87E-9
  • 7.76E-8
  • 1.59E-8
  • 4.58E-8
  • 1.12E-7
  • -0.00000184
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.0122
  • 6.87E-7
  • 0.0000112
  • 0.00000442
  • 0.000479
  • 0.000192
  • -0.000929
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.262
  • 0.0000401
  • 0.000821
  • 0.000119
  • 0.00129
  • 0.00336
  • -0.0138
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 2.83
  • 0.000443
  • 0.009
  • 0.0013
  • 0.00915
  • 0.0285
  • -0.148
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -734
  • 0.00104
  • 0.000314
  • 0.00758
  • 772
  • 35.8
  • -814
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 117
  • 0.0114
  • 0.366
  • 0.0606
  • 1.38
  • 0.738
  • -7.42
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.75
  • 0.00000556
  • 0.0000362
  • 0.0000269
  • 0.0472
  • 0.00028
  • -0.211
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • -616
  • 0.0125
  • 0.366
  • 0.0682
  • 773
  • 36.6
  • -821
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.734
  • 0.000122
  • 0.00255
  • 0.00037
  • 0.00332
  • 0.00742
  • -0.0632
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • -11.6
  • 0.000552
  • 0.0071
  • 0.15
  • 0.715
  • -0.243
  • -0.567

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
 Transport
A4
 De-construction
C1
 Transport
C2
 Waste processing
C3
 Disposal
C4
 Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0