Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Primed and painted steel structures (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location LT
Geographical representativeness description LT
Reference year 2025
Name
Primed and painted steel structures
Use advice for data set This EPD covers the cradle to gate with options scope with following modules; A1 (Raw material supply), A2 (Transport) and A3 (Manufacturing), A4 (Transport), as well as C1 (Deconstruction), C2 (Transport at end-of-life), C3 (Waste processing) and C4 (Disposal). In addition, module D - benefits and loads beyond the system boundary is included.
Technical purpose of product or process The average product of the company Pramonines metalo konstrukcijos, UAB is a steel metal structure used in the industrial and public buildings: columns, ties, beams, girders, tanks, platforms, etc. The products are applied in Lithuania and other European countries - Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden, Germany and Latvia. This product typically features the following characteristics: • Material: Steel is used due to its strength, durability, and resistance to external factors. • Purpose: A load-bearing structure designed to form the framework of buildings or other constructions, or individual structural components used in the construction of bridges, platforms, or other engineering projects. • Technical requirements: Products meet high industry standards, including load capacity, corrosion resistance, and other mechanical properties. • Custom-made: Structures are often made to meet specific client requirements, tailoring the design to individual projects. • Processing: Products can be further processed, including painting, galvanizing, or applying other corrosion protection measures. Further information can be found at https://www.pmkonstrukcijos.lt.
General comment on data set Allocation is required if some material, energy, and waste data cannot be measured separately for the product under investigation. All allocations are done as per the reference standards and the applied PCR. In this study, allocation has been done in the following ways: Raw materials: No allocation Packaging material: Allocated by mass or volume Ancillary materials: Allocated by mass or volume Manufacturing energy and waste: Allocated by mass or volume The study does not exclude any modules or processes which are stated mandatory in the reference standard and the applied PCR. The study does not exclude any hazardous materials or substances. The study includes all major raw material and energy consumption. All inputs and outputs of the unit processes, for which data is available for, are included in the calculation. There is no neglected unit process more than 1% of total mass or energy flows. The module specific total neglected input and output flows also do not exceed 5% of energy usage or mass.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 1.0 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 1.0 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2030
Time representativeness description "2025-01-24" - "2030-01-24"
Technological representativeness

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Raw material supply
A1
 Transport
A2
 Manufacturing
A3
 Transport
A4
 De-construction
C1
 Transport
C2
 Waste processing
C3
 Disposal
C4
 Recycling Potential
D
Use of renewable primary energy (PERE)
Input
  • 1.64E+3
  • 6.09
  • 331
  • 8
  • 0.289
  • 1.81
  • 22.4
  • 0.0284
  • -529
Use of renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials (PERM)
Input
  • 0.183
  • 0
  • 205
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -103
  • -103
  • 0
Total use of renewable primary energy resource (PERT)
Input
  • 1.64E+3
  • 6.09
  • 536
  • 8
  • 0.289
  • 1.81
  • -80.3
  • -103
  • -529
Use of non renewable primary energy (PENRE)
Input
  • 1.28E+4
  • 463
  • 3.77E+3
  • 504
  • 47.2
  • 105
  • 169
  • 3.07
  • -3.12E+3
Use of non renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials (PENRM)
Input
  • 0.171
  • 0
  • -0.0319
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -0.136
  • -0.00278
  • 0
Total use of non renewable primary energy resource (PENRT)
Input
  • 1.28E+4
  • 463
  • 3.77E+3
  • 504
  • 47.2
  • 105
  • 169
  • 3.06
  • -3.12E+3
Use of secondary material (SM)
Input
  • 562
  • 0.197
  • 5.99
  • 0.218
  • 0.0196
  • 0.0477
  • 0.299
  • 0.00077
  • 423
Use of renewable secondary fuels (RSF)
Input
  • 0.163
  • 0.0025
  • 0.00448
  • 0.00275
  • 0.0000512
  • 0.000587
  • 0.0236
  • 0.0000159
  • -0.047
Use of non renewable secondary fuels (NRSF)
Input
  • 0.205
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Use of net fresh water (FW)
Input
  • 20.7
  • 0.067
  • 3.59
  • 0.0733
  • 0.00306
  • 0.0149
  • 0.0795
  • 0.00318
  • -12.7
Hazardous waste disposed (HWD)
Output
  • 111
  • 0.788
  • 13.2
  • 0.733
  • 0.0527
  • 0.153
  • 1.71
  • 0.00341
  • -232
Non hazardous waste dispose (NHWD)
Output
  • 7.9E+2
  • 14.6
  • 217
  • 14.7
  • 0.72
  • 3.21
  • 67.6
  • 0.0779
  • 5.56E+3
Radioactive waste disposed (RWD)
Output
  • 0.0266
  • 0.000101
  • 0.00582
  • 0.000152
  • 0.00000518
  • 0.0000344
  • 0.000222
  • 4.77E-7
  • -0.00145
Components for re-use (CRU)
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Materials for recycling (MFR)
Output
  • 65.2
  • 0
  • 122
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 9.8E+2
  • 0
  • 0
Materials for energy recovery (MER)
Output
  • 0.00366
  • 0
  • 9.41
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Exported electrical energy (EEE)
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Exported thermal energy (EET)
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
 Transport
A2
 Manufacturing
A3
 Transport
A4
 De-construction
C1
 Transport
C2
 Waste processing
C3
 Disposal
C4
 Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 1.62E+4
  • 463
  • 3.95E+3
  • 504
  • 47.2
  • 105
  • 169
  • 3.07
  • -3.12E+3
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 53.9
  • 0.0000891
  • 0.000625
  • 0.000096
  • 0.00000129
  • 0.0000232
  • 0.000383
  • 1.98E-7
  • -0.00601
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 21.3
  • 0.109
  • 0.71
  • 0.112
  • 0.0325
  • 0.0233
  • 0.131
  • 0.000886
  • -1.08
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.0000655
  • 4.72E-7
  • 0.00000597
  • 7E-7
  • 5.52E-8
  • 1.48E-7
  • 1.16E-7
  • 3.62E-9
  • -0.00000156
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.342
  • 0.000291
  • 0.00446
  • 0.000271
  • 0.0000127
  • 0.0000582
  • 0.00127
  • 0.00000123
  • 0.0348
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 4.39
  • 0.0353
  • 0.137
  • 0.0377
  • 0.0151
  • 0.00776
  • 0.0456
  • 0.000336
  • -0.137
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 24.5
  • 0.389
  • 1.51
  • 0.415
  • 0.165
  • 0.0854
  • 0.378
  • 0.00369
  • -3.23
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -0.309
  • 0
  • -25.6
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 13.1
  • 12.8
  • 0
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 1.18E+3
  • 31.9
  • 246
  • 34.8
  • 3.61
  • 7.41
  • 20.3
  • 0.125
  • -324
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.675
  • 0.0128
  • 0.148
  • 0.0119
  • 0.000313
  • 0.00251
  • 0.0174
  • 0.000065
  • 0.011
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 1.18E+3
  • 32
  • 2.2E+2
  • 34.8
  • 3.61
  • 7.41
  • 33.4
  • 13
  • -324
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 15.1
  • 0.16
  • 0.702
  • 0.183
  • 0.0493
  • 0.0372
  • 0.125
  • 0.00132
  • -1
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 515
  • 2.22
  • 24.9
  • 2.53
  • 0.115
  • 0.526
  • 3.38
  • 0.00858
  • 69.9

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
 Transport
A2
 Manufacturing
A3
 Transport
A4
 De-construction
C1
 Transport
C2
 Waste processing
C3
 Disposal
C4
 Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 2.55E+4
  • 112
  • 5.5E+2
  • 1.2E+2
  • 6.68
  • 27.3
  • 677
  • 0.419
  • -4.51E+4
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 0.0000612
  • 1.59E-7
  • 6.7E-7
  • 2.15E-7
  • 1.41E-8
  • 4.91E-8
  • 2.95E-7
  • 5.65E-10
  • -0.000191
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0.000012
  • 3.06E-7
  • 0.00000126
  • 3.34E-7
  • 6.4E-9
  • 6.84E-8
  • 0.00000107
  • 5.51E-10
  • 0.0000273
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 27.3
  • 0.16
  • 9
  • 0.222
  • 0.0082
  • 0.0494
  • 0.363
  • 0.000758
  • -0.575
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 2.12E+3
  • 464
  • 3.02E+3
  • 507
  • 3.3
  • 81.2
  • 843
  • 6.03
  • -1.34E+3
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.0000473
  • 0.00000318
  • 0.00000487
  • 0.00000345
  • 9.25E-7
  • 6.34E-7
  • 0.00000628
  • 2.01E-8
  • -0.00000724